WHY WOULD ANYONE WANT AN "ASSAULT RIFLE?"

WHY WOULD ANYONE WANT AN “ASSAULT RIFLE?”

Posted on: December 11th, 2013 by Will Rodriguez 54 Comments

Someone asks you, “Why would anyone want an “assault rifle…?”

The hysteria over “assault rifles” has swept a large segment of the population. A senseless tragedy has been used by a hostile Administration as a propaganda “Reichstag Fire…”

The constant drumbeat plays on the worst fears of those with no training or experience in handling firearms. Back in the 1970s a well known advice columnist beat the drum… advising readers that their children could “order bazookas from mail order catalogs…” I’m sure that letters were sent to her advising that mail order of any modern firearms stopped in 1968… But like the rest of her ilk, she did not let the facts deter her campaign.

Of course, with few exceptions, private American citizens do not own “assault rifles…” An assault rifle is a military weapon of intermediate caliber that is designed to fire on full auto by the use of a selector switch. But the campaign of fear and loathing is designed to convince the uninformed that “If it looks scary, it must be an “assault weapon…”

Above is an ad for a Ruger@ 10-22 plinker in its standard form. Obviously the ad company was ignorant as they have it listed as a “semi-automatic shotgun…” Still… harmless looking. But the next ad is for a kit to make the 10-22 look like a German MG-42 machine gun. No alteration has been made to the rifle’s function or rate of fire… it is simply an elaborate (and purely cosmetic) stock.

But now, in the eyes of those who stoke the fires of the witch hunt… and the hysterical… it is obviously an “assault weapon…” Any firearm with a bayonet lug automatically becomes an “assault weapon” (used in drive-by bayonetings no doubt…)

Sometimes the media refers to “high powered assault weapons…” A 30.06 is a high powered rifle… an M-16 is an assault rifle (firing a round smaller than full-sized, but larger than pistol size)… but by definition (and practical use) high powered assault rifles are of no use… they can’t be controlled in the full auto mode. The M-14 full-auto version was a failure.

A Browning Automatic Rifle can handle full auto, but its weight and size and caliber takes it far out of the assault rifle category… and into the realm of light machine guns and essentially out of the hands of most citizens.

If most soldiers insist on referring to any metal fragments coming from an explosion as “shrapnel” (actual shrapnel is a specific type of load), I suppose that it is too much for the uninformed to care about the difference between an AR-15 and an M-16.

Back in the late ’60s the anti-gun movement ranted that it was only against “Saturday night specials” (like “assault weapons” sometimes loosely defined…) In essence, inexpensive handguns… (all that a poor family could afford for home defense.) Endless promises were made that the movement would never go after peoples’ “long guns…”

Using Soviet style negotiations, (“What’s ours is ours, what’s yours is negotiable…”) they have spent generations chipping away at firearm ownership. They are no longer interested in debate… there is nothing to debate… they are right and those who do not agree are demented or evil.

Millions of gun owners are portrayed as hicks who keep “assault weapons” to “Kill Commies for Christ…” or “Mutants after the balloon goes up…” That is, when of course, they are not planning to gun down countless school children.

The witch hunters do not want the mobs educated… and the hysterical refuse to listen to the facts (innocence is no defense…) But there are some out there who are not hysterical… who think that there is room for “compromise…” They are the ones who are the target of a “Fabian campaign…” They will listen… up to a point.

So… one of these people asks you, “Why would anyone want an assault rifle?”… you have a brief window of opportunity. Getting technical is not the best way to start… even when they understand the difference between an AR-15 and an M-16… the former is still an “assault rifle” to them.

Going into the 2nd Amendment is likely to cause their eyes to glaze over. Yes, that is a massive part of the argument, but it is unlikely to be a good opening move. The Founding Fathers used the term “The States” when they meant powers reserved to the States and “The People” when they meant the People. The ownership of 2nd Amendment weapons by those who choose to own them might be one definition of the difference between a “Citizen” and a “Subject…”

But the 2nd Amendment has been deliberately construed to mean “The right of the Government to bear arms shall not be infringed…” and applying the right to the People is actively demonized… Unless you are in a long and casual scholarly debate… the 2nd Amendment is not your best opening move.

From the early 1980s until 1995, I ran a modest “newsletter…” Friends from various places would send me articles and cartoons and poems. From time to time I would print up and mail collections to these people. By late 1995 most of us were on the web and items of interest could be sent to all interested in a matter of minutes. The newsletter ceased to exist.

But the last edition had a story that has refused to go away… gangs infiltrating the police. Above is the article printed in 1995… I also made mention of gang members in the military. If you read the article you will see that not only Constitutional considerations hampered the Chicago Police Department in preventing this infiltration… but the Police Union itself.

Between 1992 and 1995 “…at least 15 police officers have been charged with crimes, forced to resign or investigated for membership in a street gang…” Those numbers have only gone up. The Police Union position was: “The union has a responsibility to defend the right of officers to associate with anyone they want…”

“Chicago police are no longer responding in person to 911 calls reporting vehicle theft, garage burglary or simple assault…”

Most large police departments have a “phone only” policy… Prowler breaks a window on your car, the police give you a report number and you pass it on to your insurance company. But Chicago, which has the largest number of gang members in America (more below) has decided that the above crimes can be handled over the phone… Many perps who are in fact caught by the police are caught within minutes of the report… The gangs don’t have to sweat that any more…

The city of the Robocop film where the police largely just protect themselves is nearing reality. Chicago is the poster child… In 2012, Chicago recorded 506 homicides.. most gang related. Where is the outrage… the hysteria? All that is said is that “Gun control will keep guns out of the hands of gangs…”

“The Latin Kings have over 25,000[5][6] members in the city of Chicago alone and have organized chapters in over 41 states and several Latin American and European countries, including: Mexico, Spain, Dominican Republic, Canada, Italy, Ecuador, Peru, Puerto Rico, Portugal, Brazil, United Kingdom and others.

The newly released Chicago Crime Commission publication, “The Gang Book 2012”, conveyed a startling statistic that Chicago has more gang members than any other city in the United States: 150,000 members[7]

Traditionally Los Angeles County was considered the Gang Capital of America, with an estimated 120,000 (41,000 in the City) gang members.[8]

Chicago has a higher rate of gang membership per capita than Los Angeles.[9] The state of Illinois has a higher rate of gang membership (8-11 gang members per 1,000 population) than California (5-7 gang members per 1,000 population).[10]”

LAWOFFICER states:

The Gang Threats

Presently, there are about 800,000 hardcore street gang members living in the U.S. If you add in the 150,000 or so prison gang members currently behind bars and the 50,000 or so outlaw biker gang members, that’s about 1 million potential threats to officers. More than a few of these 800,000 gangbangers are third- and fourth-generation thugs. Some are as young as 8 years old.

Currently, the FBI recognizes about 40 national-level gangs. By national-level, they mean gangs that have crossed state lines to set up their criminal enterprises. The most recognizable of these national-level gangs are the Bloods, the Crips, the Latin Kings, the Gangster Disciples, Mara Salvatrucha (MS-13), Nortenos-14 and the prison gang, the Mexican Mafia.

However, it’s the emergence of the other 2,000-plus local or neighborhood street gangs that I want to focus on in this piece. This is because the FBI feels it’s these local gangs that pose the greatest threat to law enforcement today.

Recognizing You Have a Problem

Every city has a gang problem, either from national-level or homegrown gangs. My hometown of Rochester, N.Y., has the G-Boyz and the Tremont Street Gang. Tampa, Fla., has the 54th Avenue Gang. Miami has the 77th Street Gang, and Los Angeles has had the 2,000-plus member Florencia (or F-13) gang operating in parts of their city for years. You know who your local gangsters are.

Municipalities that claim not to have a gang problem are in denial: They’re delaying the plague that these street vermin bring to the communities they reside in, which is the first step to being overrun with gang crime.

Gangs are a $5-billion-a-year business. Street-corner drug dealing, drive-by shootings, home invasions, robberies, car-jackings and school violence—not to mention the graffiti and sneaker-adorned telephone wires that gangs use to mark or tag their territory—are just some of the more outward signs that gangs have set up operation in your town.

Law Enforcement’s Approach

History’s shown us that traditional law enforcement tactics haven’t worked to curb criminal gang activity. Just taking down one or two gangbangers for individual crimes still leaves the gang active and operational. Even if you’re lucky enough to nab a gang leader, most still have the juice to run their criminal enterprise while locked up.

Remember: There are almost 150,000 prison gangbangers behind bars, and most prison gangs are just off-shoots of street gangs. Unless the entire gang is disrupted and dismantled, those on the outside are still active and able to keep their illegal enterprises operational. Also, just taking down one or two gang members gives the appearance to the gang that their local police agency is inept and ineffective in completely shutting down their operations.

Large cities have a vested interest in denying that gangs exist… or that they are any kind of a major threat. Mayors in most large cities can’t think farther than the next election… and they don’t want the electorate to demand action that is both complex and expensive… Police chiefs know that if they want to keep their jobs, they won’t contradict the mayor.

The Seattle Police Department had a chance to nip the gang movement in the bud in the 1980s… but the official policy was that “there are no gangs… just wannabees…” Meanwhile hard core gang recruiters from California were setting up very real gangs in Seattle. Google the list of street gangs in Seattle and you will be shocked by the number. For an even bigger shock, look at the number of gangs on the Navajo reservation alone…

Some mayors try to pretend that most gangs are just another type of “neighborhood association” and are a “positive force…” Having taken that position… cracking down on them causes outcries of “racism” from radical politicians.

And of course… the infiltration problem: LAWENFORCER goes on to state:

Law Enforcement Isn’t Immune

Here’s a tidbit worth mentioning that will piss off a lot of cops. It’s long been accepted that gangbangers have been infiltrating the military for years now. All five branches have been targeted by the major gangs for not only the weapons training, but the assault tactics taught during basic and advanced training.

In fact, military trucks, buildings and walls lining the streets of some of our own military installations are replete with street-gang graffiti.

Now, the dirty secret: Law enforcement isn’t immune to the street-gang infiltration either. In fact, last year, the DEA agent in charge of a local drug taskforce was found to be a high-ranking street-gang member who was actually planning to take down an armored car with a group of his fellow bangers. Luckily, his plan was discovered before it could be put into operation.

Recently a law enforcement agency in southwest Florida was targeted for infiltration by a local gangbanger who’d completed almost all of his pre-employment exams for the police academy—his physical, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, his physical agility tests, even his background checks were just about done. If it wasn’t for the sharp eyes of a local street cop who recognized the homemade gang tattoo on the subject’s forearm, this guy might be in the academy as we speak, training on the firing range or even working his way through the FTO program.

Again, the military is mentioned. Just as police chiefs know better than to say that “the emperor has no clothes…” generals play down the problem. It is not that “armies” of soldiers belonging to gangs will overrun the country… it is rather that weapons and tactics training… and access to serious weaponry to equip their gangs… National Guard units have had some of the biggest problems…

The FBI’s 2007 report on gang membership in the military stated that the military’s recruit screening process is ineffective, and allows gang members/extremists to enter the military. The report listed at least eight instances in the previous three years in which gang members had obtained military weapons for their own use.[3]

“Gang Activity in the U.S. Armed Forces Increasing”, dated January 12, 2007, stated that street gangs including the Bloods, Crips, Black Disciples, Gangster Disciples, Hells Angels, Latin Kings, The 18th Street Gang, Mara Salvatrucha (MS-13), Mexican Mafia, Nortenos, Surenos, and Vice Lords have been documented on military installations both domestic and international, although recruiting gang members violates military regulations.[4]

and

http://michellemalkin.com/2006/05/04/gangstas-in-the-military/

The Administration and the witch hunters play up a relative handful (in a population of 300 million) ghastly incidents. But the threat of gangs in America is the elephant in the room that they refuse to talk about (except to imply that if law abiding citizens did not have weapons, the gangs would not…) In fact some sources of gang information are drying up.

Criminal street gangs are responsible for the majority of violent crimes within the U.S. and are the primary distributors of most illicit drugs, according to a 2009 report by the Justice Department’s National Drug Intelligence Center, or NDIC.

The NDIC was a task force established in 1993 to coordinate law enforcement actions to stop drug trafficking and to curb the growing threat of violent gangs in the U.S. The agency was closed by the Obama administration in June 2011.

Prior to the shutdown of the NDIC, the agency released statistics on street gangs that some found unusual.

In 2010, the agency’s National Drug Threat Assessment stated that drugs were being sold on behalf of the cartels in “more than 2,500 cities.”

Then, in the 2011 official assessment, that number was reduced to “a thousand U.S. cities” – meaning that in one year, criminal drug gangs were cleaned out of 1,500 cities resulting in a 60-percent reduction.

Dave Gibson, a columnist for Examiner.com, asked, “Where were the press releases? Why isn’t the Obama campaign talking about this rather astounding feat every day?”

The NDIC reports were entirely removed from the Justice Department’s website.

An attempt to access the report brings users to a page that reads, “This website is no longer maintained…”

The street gangs have learned what the bikers did before them, and the Mafia before them… If you are swimming in money, you can hire $1200. an hour lawyers. For many crimes they can get you off… for others they can plea bargain you way down. If all else fails, they can get you out on bail for a very long time… or if remanded… cause endless delays… (until maybe some witnesses vanish and others have memory problems…) An honest citizen brought up on a “technical” violation or in error gets to face the full weight of government funded prosecution.

Alexander Solzhenitsyn (Gulag Archipelago) talked of how as an artillery officer in the Red Army in WWII he wrote a letter to a relative complaining of Stalin’s wasting of soldier’s lives. The NKVD showed up and arrested him.

On the train heading to Siberia there were many soldiers in his situation… there were also many thugs… Normally the soldiers could have wiped the floor with the thugs… but the thugs had home made weapons… if they were caught with them the guards would simply take the weapons away and give the thugs a beating… “After all… they’re criminals… how do you expect them to behave…?” But since the soldiers were *not* criminals they fell into the category of *political prisoner*… and a “political prisoner” with a weapon equals… a terrorist. If the soldiers had so much as a club they would either be shot or have their sentences increased.

It is no use telling the witch hunters or the hysterical that “When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns…” The hysterical don’t believe that for a second… and the witch hunters don’t care. They can’t or won’t go after the countless thousands of gang members who are guilty of a felony simply by owning a firearm… which their first felony conviction prohibited… (a feeble effort at some of the right wing crazies… but only if they are without massive financial resources for high-priced “mouthpieces…”)

But like the NKVD guards, they would lead the charge against any honest citizen for the slightest violation… technical or otherwise… on even the slightest suspicion. Standard drill is that if they target you, your firearms will be confiscated and even if absolutely vindicated you may spend years trying to get them back… if ever.

In the early days of this administration, one of their departments prepared a report about terrorist groups… Seemed to obsess on “domestic terrorists” Not so much gangs… but returning combat veterans. The paper leaked, veterans organizations howled and the administration immediately distanced itself… but the tone was set. It is not the returning gang members from Iraq and Afghanistan who are the potential terrorists…

Meanwhile… the good old days of a single burglar who preferred an empty house is giving way in many places to home invasions by numbers of well armed (and legally sheltered) criminals. As their firepower increases… the move is on to reduce the firepower of millions of honest citizens…(and to eventually disarm them completely…this is not paranoia… it is the often stated goal of most anti-gun organizations to have a “utopia” where only the police and military have firearms…)

Mexico has both the “right to bear arms” and laws that make it impossible for citizens to have legal arms of most types… A .38 pistol here, a single barrel shotgun there… not much compared to what the drug gangs imports from the BATF, the U.S. and other foreign countries.

While many Mexicans have more than what the law allows, they know that (unless they are rich and powerful) that the government will crush them if they show up in public with banned weapons. At the end of this posting I have attached an item on Mexican gun control laws.

Of major interest to me was that some of the poor Mexicans are finding it impossible to live with the drug gangs… and though miserably armed, have tried to restore law and order… Their courage is of a most desparate sort. I have posted the links immediately below:

http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/21/16623826-mexicans-weary-of-drug-gangs-form-vigilante-patrols

and… http://reason.com/blog/2012/12/11/mexico-as-an-example-that-tighter-gun-co

Mexican drug cartels operate on both sides of the border. For now they try to keep a much lower profile on this side… though there are many killings and kidnappings… they try to “keep it in the family…”… for now…

So, if someone asks you why anyone would want an “assault weapon” you might give a brief summary of some of the above… Have facts and links written down if you are “called” on your statements.

Remember that you are law abiding citizens… do not make wild statements or comments about “my cold dead hand…” to those who think that maybe “compromise” is a good idea… but are willing to hear you out.

Keep your politics out of it except where specific to the issue. Many Democratic Congressmen oppose the witch hunt (if only because they come from “gun” parts of the country…) and some Republicans favor punishing law abiding gun owners. Much of the media loves to interview frightened people about gun control… and then tries to locate the most ignorant inbred yokel to give an “opposing view…”

You might be the only gun owner that this person knows… They are likely to judge all gun owners by how you comport yourself…

More references

http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/real-gun-threat-illegal-alien-street-gangs/

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-57559179/china-school-knife-attack-leaves-23-injured/

http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/afp_asiapacific/view/1254225/1/.html

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/11/30/15574250-bow-and-arrow-type-attack-leaves-3-dead-in-casper-wyo-including-2-in-college-classroom-officials-say?lite